linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] .clang-format: Remove conditional comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f474396f8f47c303e3a3ac90a582c116e38e50e4.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:56:06 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] .clang-format: Remove conditional comments

On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 22:33 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> It is, yeah; however, the concern is that there may be developers
> running an old clang-format from their distro (i.e. not using it for
> compiling the kernel).

I expect that'd be extremely unusual.

> We need to compare the functionality advantage
> vs. the inconvenience of installing a current LLVM. The best would be
> to ask whoever is using it right now, but there is no easy way to do
> that -- many will only notice when the change is actually pushed :-)

Do remember that this patch is for the current kernel and
not any old version that someone might be compiling.

The current kernel _requires_ clang 10.0+ and that would
obviously provide clang-format 10+ as well.