[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8648a2e3-1052-3b5b-11ce-87628ac8dd33@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:04:23 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: add IOTLB API support
On 2020/11/3 上午1:11, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 07:44:43PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/10/30 下午6:54, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 06:02:18PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2020/10/30 上午1:43, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>>>> This patch enables the IOTLB API support for vhost-vsock devices,
>>>>> allowing the userspace to emulate an IOMMU for the guest.
>>>>>
>>>>> These changes were made following vhost-net, in details this patch:
>>>>> - exposes VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM feature and inits the iotlb
>>>>> device if the feature is acked
>>>>> - implements VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES and
>>>>> VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctls
>>>>> - calls vq_meta_prefetch() before vq processing to prefetch vq
>>>>> metadata address in IOTLB
>>>>> - provides .read_iter, .write_iter, and .poll callbacks for the
>>>>> chardev; they are used by the userspace to exchange IOTLB messages
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch was tested with QEMU and a patch applied [1] to fix a
>>>>> simple issue:
>>>>> $ qemu -M q35,accel=kvm,kernel-irqchip=split \
>>>>> -drive file=fedora.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio \
>>>>> -device intel-iommu,intremap=on \
>>>>> -device vhost-vsock-pci,guest-cid=3,iommu_platform=on
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Patch looks good, but a question:
>>>>
>>>> It looks to me you don't enable ATS which means vhost won't get any
>>>> invalidation request or did I miss anything?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're right, I didn't see invalidation requests, only miss and
>>> updates.
>>> Now I have tried to enable 'ats' and 'device-iotlb' but I still
>>> don't see any invalidation.
>>>
>>> How can I test it? (Sorry but I don't have much experience yet with
>>> vIOMMU)
>>
>>
>> I guess it's because the batched unmap. Maybe you can try to use
>> "intel_iommu=strict" in guest kernel command line to see if it works.
>>
>> Btw, make sure the qemu contains the patch [1]. Otherwise ATS won't
>> be enabled for recent Linux Kernel in the guest.
>
> The problem was my kernel, it was built with a tiny configuration.
> Using fedora stock kernel I can see the 'invalidate' requests, but I
> also had the following issues.
>
> Do they make you ring any bells?
>
> $ ./qemu -m 4G -smp 4 -M q35,accel=kvm,kernel-irqchip=split \
> -drive file=fedora.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio \
> -device intel-iommu,intremap=on,device-iotlb=on \
> -device vhost-vsock-pci,guest-cid=6,iommu_platform=on,ats=on,id=v1
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: vtd_iova_to_slpte: detected IOVA overflow
> (iova=0x1d40000030c0)
It's a hint that IOVA exceeds the AW. It might be worth to check whether
the missed IOVA reported from IOTLB is legal.
Thanks
> qemu-system-x86_64: vtd_iommu_translate: detected translation failure
> (dev=00:03:00, iova=0x1d40000030c0)
> qemu-system-x86_64: New fault is not recorded due to compression
> of faults
>
> Guest kernel messages:
> [ 44.940872] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
> [ 44.941989] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [00:03.0] PASID
> ffffffff fault addr ffff88W
> [ 49.785884] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
> [ 49.788874] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [00:03.0] PASID
> ffffffff fault addr ffff88W
>
>
> QEMU: b149dea55c Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'remotes/cschoenebeck/tags/pull-9p-20201102' into staging
>
> Linux guest: 5.8.16-200.fc32.x86_64
>
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists