linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Add the new api to install irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201103095205.ywabphbc2xbop6ae@gilmour.lan>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:52:05 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
        airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Add the new api to install irq

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:10:41AM +0800, Tian Tao wrote:
> Add new api devm_drm_irq_install() to register interrupts,
> no need to call drm_irq_uninstall() when the drm module is removed.
> 
> v2:
> fixed the wrong parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/drm/drm_drv.h     |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> index cd162d4..0fe5243 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_color_mgmt.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_file.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_irq.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_mode_object.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> @@ -678,6 +679,28 @@ static int devm_drm_dev_init(struct device *parent,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void devm_drm_dev_irq_uninstall(void *data)
> +{
> +	drm_irq_uninstall(data);
> +}
> +
> +int devm_drm_irq_install(struct device *parent,
> +			 struct drm_device *dev, int irq)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = drm_irq_install(dev, irq);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action(parent, devm_drm_dev_irq_uninstall, dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		devm_drm_dev_irq_uninstall(dev);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_drm_irq_install);
> +

Shouldn't we tie the IRQ to the drm device (so with drmm_add_action)
instead of tying it to the underlying device?

Maxime
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)