lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:31:44 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hverkuil@...all.nl, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Add support for printing
 V4L2 and DRM fourccs

Hi Rasmus,

Thanks for the review.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:44:00PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 27/04/2020 16.53, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Add a printk modifier %p4cc (for pixel format) for printing V4L2 and DRM
> > pixel formats denoted by fourccs. The fourcc encoding is the same for both
> > so the same implementation can be used.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > since v2:
> > 
> > - Add comments to explain why things are being done
> > 
> > - Print characters under 32 (space) as hexadecimals in parenthesis.
> > 
> > - Do not print spaces in the fourcc codes.
> > 
> > - Make use of a loop over the fourcc characters instead of
> >   put_unaligned_le32(). This is necessary to omit spaces in the output.
> > 
> > - Use DRM style format instead of V4L2. This provides the precise code as
> >   a numerical value as well as explicit endianness information.
> > 
> > - Added WARN_ON_ONCE() sanity checks. Comments on these are welcome; I'd
> >   expect them mostly be covered by the tests.
> > 
> > - Added tests for %p4cc in lib/test_printf.c
> > 
> >  Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst | 12 ++++
> >  lib/test_printf.c                         | 17 +++++
> >  lib/vsprintf.c                            | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst b/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> > index 8ebe46b1af39..7aa0451e06fb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> > @@ -545,6 +545,18 @@ For printing netdev_features_t.
> >  
> >  Passed by reference.
> >  
> > +V4L2 and DRM FourCC code (pixel format)
> > +---------------------------------------
> > +
> > +::
> > +
> > +	%p4cc
> > +
> > +Print a FourCC code used by V4L2 or DRM, including format endianness and
> > +its numerical value as hexadecimal.
> > +
> > +Passed by reference.
> > +
> >  Thanks
> >  ======
> >  
> > diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
> > index 2d9f520d2f27..a14754086707 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_printf.c
> > +++ b/lib/test_printf.c
> > @@ -624,6 +624,22 @@ static void __init fwnode_pointer(void)
> >  	software_node_unregister_nodes(softnodes);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void __init fourcc_pointer(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct {
> > +		u32 code;
> > +		char *str;
> > +	} const try[] = {
> > +		{ 0x20104646, "FF(10) little-endian (0x20104646)", },
> > +		{ 0xa0104646, "FF(10) big-endian (0xa0104646)", },
> > +		{ 0x10111213, "(13)(12)(11)(10) little-endian (0x10111213)", },
> > +	};
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(try); i++)
> > +		test(try[i].str, "%p4cc", &try[i].code);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void __init
> >  errptr(void)
> >  {
> > @@ -668,6 +684,7 @@ test_pointer(void)
> >  	flags();
> >  	errptr();
> >  	fwnode_pointer();
> > +	fourcc_pointer();
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void __init selftest(void)
> > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > index 7c488a1ce318..02e7906619c0 100644
> > --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> > +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > @@ -1721,6 +1721,89 @@ char *netdev_bits(char *buf, char *end, const void *addr,
> >  	return special_hex_number(buf, end, num, size);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static noinline_for_stack
> > +char *fourcc_string(char *buf, char *end, const u32 *__fourcc,
> > +		    struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
> > +{
> > +#define FOURCC_HEX_CHAR_STR		"(xx)"
> > +#define FOURCC_BIG_ENDIAN_STR		" big-endian"
> > +#define FOURCC_LITTLE_ENDIAN_STR	" little-endian"
> > +#define FOURCC_HEX_NUMBER		" (0x01234567)"
> > +#define FOURCC_STRING_MAX						\
> > +	FOURCC_HEX_CHAR_STR FOURCC_HEX_CHAR_STR FOURCC_HEX_CHAR_STR	\
> > +	FOURCC_HEX_CHAR_STR FOURCC_LITTLE_ENDIAN_STR FOURCC_HEX_NUMBER
> > +	struct printf_spec my_spec = {
> > +		.type = FORMAT_TYPE_UINT,
> > +		.field_width = 2,
> > +		.flags = SMALL,
> > +		.base = 16,
> > +		.precision = -1,
> > +	};
> > +	char __s[sizeof(FOURCC_STRING_MAX)];
> > +	char *s = __s;
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The 31st bit defines the endianness of the data, so save its printing
> > +	 * for later.
> > +	 */
> > +	u32 fourcc = *__fourcc & ~BIT(31);
> > +	int ret;
> 
> Dereference __fourcc ...
> 
> > +	if (check_pointer(&buf, end, __fourcc, spec))
> > +		return buf;
> 
> .. and then sanity check it?
> 
> > +	if (fmt[1] != 'c' || fmt[2] != 'c')
> > +		return error_string(buf, end, "(%p4?)", spec);
> 
> Doesn't that want to come before everything else, including the
> check_pointer()?

Agreed on all three.

> 
> > +	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(fourcc); i++, fourcc >>= 8) {
> > +		unsigned char c = fourcc;
> > +
> > +		/* Weed out spaces */
> > +		if (c == ' ')
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		/* Print non-control characters as-is */
> > +		if (c > ' ') {
> > +			*s = c;
> > +			s++;
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> 
> Are you sure you want to pass non-ascii characters through?

I'll print the hexadecimal value in v4.

> 
> > +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sizeof(__s) <
> > +				 (s - __s) + sizeof(FOURCC_HEX_CHAR_STR)))
> > +			break;
> 
> I really don't see the point of these checks.  Why check here but not
> before we output a non-control character? That seems rather arbitrary.
> Also, assume we do take this break, (to be continued below [*])

Will remove.

> 
> > +		*s = '(';
> > +		s++;
> > +		s = number(s, s + 2, c, my_spec);
> 
> You can drop my_spec and just use "s = hex_byte_pack(s, c);".

Ack, this cleans it up indeed.

> 
> > +		*s = ')';
> > +		s++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = strscpy(s, *__fourcc & BIT(31) ? FOURCC_BIG_ENDIAN_STR
> > +					     : FOURCC_LITTLE_ENDIAN_STR,
> > +		      sizeof(__s) - (s - __s));
> > +	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0))
> > +		s += ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(sizeof(__s) <
> > +			  (s - __s) + sizeof(FOURCC_HEX_NUMBER))) {
> 
> [*] then AFAICT this WARN_ON_ONCE is guaranteed to also fire [the
> left-hand side is the same as before, the right-hand side consists of a
> quantity s-__s that can only be larger or equal than before and a
> constant sizeof(FOURCC_HEX_NUMBER) that is definitely larger], hence we
> do not enter this if () and [**]
> 
> > +		*s = ' ';
> > +		s++;
> > +		*s = '(';
> > +		s++;
> > +		/* subtract parentheses and the space from the size */
> > +		special_hex_number(s, s + sizeof(FOURCC_HEX_NUMBER) - 3,
> > +				   *__fourcc, sizeof(u32));
> 
> Urgh. Don't we have an ARRAY_END() macro that let's you call this with
> (s, ARRAY_END(__s)) as buf, end?

We do, yes. In drivers/block/floppy.c. :-)

> 
> > +		s += sizeof(u32) * 2 + 2 /* 0x */;
> 
> Why, when special_hex_number returns a pointer to one-past-its-output?

I'll use that for v4.

> 
> > +		*s = ')';
> > +		s++;
> > +		*s = '\0';
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return string(buf, end, __s, spec);
> 
> [**] __s does not get nul-terminated, so we call string() with stack
> garbage.
> 
> I'd say just drop those checks, and de-obfuscate the sizing of the __s
> array so it becomes obviously large enough for what the algorithm can
> produce. Just
> 
> char __s[sizeof("(01)(02)(03)(04) little-endian (0x01020304)")]
> 
> or something like that should be sufficient.

Done.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ