lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:56:51 -0500
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>, fweisbec@...il.com,
        neeraj.iitr10@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] srcu: Fix invoke_rcu_callbacks() segcb length
 adjustment

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 03:47:14PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:25:59AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > With earlier patches, the negative counting of the unsegmented list
> > cannot be used to adjust the segmented one. To fix this, sample the
> > unsegmented length in advance, and use it after CB execution to adjust
> > the segmented list's length.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> 
> This breaks bisection, you need to either fix up the previous patch
> by adding this diff inside or better yet: expand what you did
> in "rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executed"
> to also handle srcu before introducing the segcb count.

Right, the latter is better. Let us do that.

thanks,

 - Joel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ