[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87f63dc12739b346d556f85537324d3ae055097d.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 09:55:24 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, robh@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, james.morse@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, sashal@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, allison@...utok.net,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, masahiroy@...nel.org, bhsharma@...hat.com,
mbrugger@...e.com, hsinyi@...omium.org, tao.li@...o.com,
christophe.leroy@....fr
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com,
balajib@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] powerpc: Refactor kexec functions to move arch
independent code to ima
Hi Lakshmi,
On Fri, 2020-10-30 at 10:44 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> The functions ima_get_kexec_buffer() and ima_free_kexec_buffer(),
> that handle carrying forward the IMA measurement logs on kexec for
> powerpc do not have architecture specific code, but they are currently
> defined for powerpc only.
>
> Move ima_get_kexec_buffer() and ima_free_kexec_buffer() to IMA
> subsystem. A later patch in this series will use these functions for
> carrying forward the IMA measurement log for ARM64.
>
> With the above refactoring arch/powerpc/kexec/ima.c contains only
> functions used when CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC is enabled. Update Makefile
> in arch/powerpc/kexec to include arch/powerpc/kexec/ima.c only
> when CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC is enabled.
>
> Co-developed-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
Similar comments to 1/4.
- Last line of first paragraph can be rephrased like " ... on kexec,
do not contain architecture specific code, but are currently limited to
powerpc."
- This patch should be limited to moving existing functions.
Truncate the Subject line to "Move arch independent IMA kexec functions
to ima_kexec.c."
- Don't refer to a later patch, but explain the purpose here. For
example, "Move ... , making them accessible to other archs."
- The definition of "FDT_PROP_IMA_KEXEC_BUFFER" should be made as a
separate, prepartory patch, prior to the existing 1/4. The resulting
code being moved in this patch (and similarly for 1/4) will be exactly
the same as the code being deleted.
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists