[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4debc77f5c72e1f4eff36a700231493bf9fbf404.camel@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 20:55:19 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
bgolaszewski@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] dt-bindings: pwm: Add binding for RPi firmware
PWM bus
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 13:06 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 11:39:35 +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > The PWM bus controlling the fan in RPi's official PoE hat can only be
> > controlled by the board's co-processor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Update bindings to use 2 #pwm-cells
> >
> > .../arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> > .../pwm/raspberrypi,firmware-pwm.h | 13 ++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,firmware-pwm.h
> >
>
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.example.dt.yaml: firmware: pwm:#pwm-cells:0:0: 2 was expected
Yes I forgot to update the example...
Regards,
Nicolas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists