linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] .clang-format: Remove conditional comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72k11+VO-igyHRakJEGuSmsDJyQCpYDVeNxZwRt62yCFXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 04:57:12 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] .clang-format: Remove conditional comments

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 4:15 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> No one ever will use clang-format on the current kernel sources
> without having a recent version of clang and clang-format.

Why? Many distros come with clang-format pre-packaged, and in fact the
original patch (that you commented on) argued for the >= 4 requirement
that way.

I am not saying we cannot change it, in fact I'd prefer if we do it
(see my answer to Nick); but I don't understand your basis to claim
nobody is installing their distro clang-format package.

Cheers,
Miguel