linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/14] media: sunxi: Add support for the A31 MIPI CSI-2 controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201104111710.GB287014@aptenodytes>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:17:10 +0100
From:   Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc:     Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Yong Deng <yong.deng@...ewell.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, kevin.lhopital@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] media: sunxi: Add support for the A31 MIPI CSI-2
 controller

Hi,

On Mon 02 Nov 20, 10:21, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 07:45:18PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> > On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > The A31 MIPI CSI-2 controller is a dedicated MIPI CSI-2 controller
> > > found on Allwinner SoCs such as the A31 and V3/V3s.
> > > 
> > > It is a standalone block, connected to the CSI controller on one side
> > > and to the MIPI D-PHY block on the other. It has a dedicated address
> > > space, interrupt line and clock.
> > > 
> > > Currently, the MIPI CSI-2 controller is hard-tied to a specific CSI
> > > controller (CSI0) but newer SoCs (such as the V5) may allow switching
> > > MIPI CSI-2 controllers between CSI controllers.
> > > 
> > > It is represented as a V4L2 subdev to the CSI controller and takes a
> > > MIPI CSI-2 sensor as its own subdev, all using the fwnode graph and
> > > media controller API.
> > 
> > Maybe this is a bad idea, but I was thinking:
> > This driver basically just turn on/off and catch some interrupts for errors,
> > and all the rest of v4l2 config you just forward to the next subdevice
> > on the pipeline.
> > 
> > So instead of exposing it as a subdevice, I was wondering if modeling
> > this driver also through the phy subsystem wouldn't be cleaner, so
> > you won't need all the v4l2 subdevice/topology boilerplate code that
> > it seems you are not using (unless you have plans to add controls or
> > some specific configuration on this node later).
> > 
> > But this would require changes on the sun6i-csi driver.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> Eventually we'll need to filter the virtual channels / datatypes I
> guess, so it's definitely valuable to have it in v4l2

Agreed and like I mentionned in the discussion on 00/14 I don't think it
would be a cleaner way to expose things.

There's also the fact that newer SoCs like the V5 seem to allow connecting
any MIPI CSI-2 controller to any CSI controller, so the graph representation
is definitely welcome here.

Paul

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)