[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ECR9JQ.NFV4ZB9VUP182@crapouillou.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 11:17:02 +0000
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.or, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ingenic/TCU: Remove NULL pointer check before
clk_enable/disable
Hi,
Le mer. 4 nov. 2020 à 7:11, Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn> a écrit :
> Because clk_enable and clk_disable already checked NULL clock
> parameter,
> so the additional checks are unnecessary, just remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cheers,
-Paul
> ---
> drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> index 9382dc3aa27e..ffcb3667fd2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> @@ -445,8 +445,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused tcu_pm_suspend(void)
> {
> struct ingenic_tcu *tcu = ingenic_tcu;
>
> - if (tcu->clk)
> - clk_disable(tcu->clk);
> + clk_disable(tcu->clk);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -455,8 +454,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused tcu_pm_resume(void)
> {
> struct ingenic_tcu *tcu = ingenic_tcu;
>
> - if (tcu->clk)
> - clk_enable(tcu->clk);
> + clk_enable(tcu->clk);
> }
>
> static struct syscore_ops __maybe_unused tcu_pm_ops = {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists