[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160461665604.60232.10802283348863949674@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 14:50:56 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Robert Walker <robert.walker@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] perf cs-etm: Support thread stack and callchain
Quoting Leo Yan (2020-02-19 21:26:52)
> This patch series adds support for thread stack and callchain; this patch
> set depends on the instruction sample fix patch set [1].
>
> This patch set get more complex, so before divide into small groups, I'd
> like to use this patch set version to include all relevant patches, hope
> this can give whole context for related code change.
Was this split up into small groups and sent again? I didn't see
anything when searching lkml.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists