[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201106020957.GB13572@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:09:57 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Robert Walker <robert.walker@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] perf cs-etm: Support thread stack and callchain
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:50:56PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Leo Yan (2020-02-19 21:26:52)
> > This patch series adds support for thread stack and callchain; this patch
> > set depends on the instruction sample fix patch set [1].
> >
> > This patch set get more complex, so before divide into small groups, I'd
> > like to use this patch set version to include all relevant patches, hope
> > this can give whole context for related code change.
>
> Was this split up into small groups and sent again? I didn't see
> anything when searching lkml.
No, this patch series is the last one for upstreaming; since I worked
on other stuffs, so didn't continue to upstream to the mainline kernel.
IIRC, there have a concern for a pontential breakage for perf cs-etm
testing, so falls to backlog. Let me check with Mathieu/Mike offline
for how to proceed for this patch set. Thanks for bringing up.
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists