lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4be2e157-fbc1-6e2c-cdd7-a32514884754@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:15:53 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
CC:     "chao@...nel.org" <chao@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Jieon Seol <jieon.seol@...sung.com>,
        Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
        Mankyu PARK <manq.park@...sung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
        Keoseong Park <keosung.park@...sung.com>,
        SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@...sung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Jaemyung Lee <jaemyung.lee@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: change write_hint for hot/warm nodes

On 2020/11/4 2:58, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/03, Daejun Park wrote:
>> In the fs-based mode of F2FS, the mapping of hot/warm node to
>> WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET should be changed to WRITE_LIFE_SHORT.
>>
>> As a result of analyzing the write pattern of f2fs using real workload,
>> hot/warm nodes have high update ratio close to hot data.[*]
>> However, F2FS passes write hints for hot/warm nodes as WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET.
> 
> I prefer to keep it as is, since basically node blocks should be separatly
> stored from data blocks in different erase blocks in order to match F2FS GC

Correct, I missed that the change will break HOT_DATA type and {HOT,WARM}_NODE
type data separation in FTL.

> and FTL GC units. And, we don't do IPU for node blocks which doesn't make sense
> to say *update ratio*.

IMO, if fs discard is fast enough, both IPU and OPU will cause original blkaddr in
FTL being invalid, we can compare update ratio on {I,O}PU IOs inside FTL; otherwise,
we can't.

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Furthermore, WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET is a default value of write hint when it is
>> not provided from the file system.
>> In storage, write_hint is used to distinguish streams (e.g. NVMe).
>> So, the hot/warm node of F2FS is not distinguished from other write_hints,
>> which can make the wrong stream seperation.
>>
>> * Liang, Yu, et al. "An empirical study of F2FS on mobile devices." 2017
>> IEEE 23rd International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing
>> Systems and Applications (RTCSA).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> v2: update documentation and comments
>> ---
>>   Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst | 4 ++--
>>   fs/f2fs/segment.c                  | 6 +++---
>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
>> index b8ee761c9922..afa3da7cfade 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
>> @@ -717,8 +717,8 @@ WRITE_LIFE_LONG       "                        WRITE_LIFE_LONG
>>   ===================== ======================== ===================
>>   User                  F2FS                     Block
>>   ===================== ======================== ===================
>> -                      META                     WRITE_LIFE_MEDIUM;
>> -                      HOT_NODE                 WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET
>> +                      META                     WRITE_LIFE_MEDIUM
>> +                      HOT_NODE                 WRITE_LIFE_SHORT
>>                         WARM_NODE                "
>>                         COLD_NODE                WRITE_LIFE_NONE
>>   ioctl(COLD)           COLD_DATA                WRITE_LIFE_EXTREME
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 1596502f7375..577ab7516c6b 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -3160,8 +3160,8 @@ int f2fs_rw_hint_to_seg_type(enum rw_hint hint)
>>    *
>>    * User                  F2FS                     Block
>>    * ----                  ----                     -----
>> - *                       META                     WRITE_LIFE_MEDIUM;
>> - *                       HOT_NODE                 WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET
>> + *                       META                     WRITE_LIFE_MEDIUM
>> + *                       HOT_NODE                 WRITE_LIFE_SHORT
>>    *                       WARM_NODE                "
>>    *                       COLD_NODE                WRITE_LIFE_NONE
>>    * ioctl(COLD)           COLD_DATA                WRITE_LIFE_EXTREME
>> @@ -3208,7 +3208,7 @@ enum rw_hint f2fs_io_type_to_rw_hint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>   				return WRITE_LIFE_EXTREME;
>>   		} else if (type == NODE) {
>>   			if (temp == WARM || temp == HOT)
>> -				return WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET;
>> +				return WRITE_LIFE_SHORT;
>>   			else if (temp == COLD)
>>   				return WRITE_LIFE_NONE;
>>   		} else if (type == META) {
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
> .
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ