lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:12:46 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     si-wei liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>, mst@...hat.com,
        lingshan.zhu@...el.com
Cc:     joao.m.martins@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: fix page pinning leakage in error path
 (rework)


On 2020/11/5 上午7:40, si-wei liu wrote:
>
> On 11/3/2020 6:42 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/10/30 下午3:45, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>>> Pinned pages are not properly accounted particularly when
>>> mapping error occurs on IOTLB update. Clean up dangling
>>> pinned pages for the error path.
>>>
>>> The memory usage for bookkeeping pinned pages is reverted
>>> to what it was before: only one single free page is needed.
>>> This helps reduce the host memory demand for VM with a large
>>> amount of memory, or in the situation where host is running
>>> short of free memory.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4c8cf31885f6 ("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
>>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 64 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>> index b6d9016..8da8558 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>> @@ -560,6 +560,8 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>>         if (r)
>>>           vhost_iotlb_del_range(dev->iotlb, iova, iova + size - 1);
>>> +    else
>>> +        atomic64_add(size >> PAGE_SHIFT, &dev->mm->pinned_vm);
>>>         return r;
>>>   }
>>> @@ -591,14 +593,16 @@ static int 
>>> vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>>       unsigned long list_size = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page *);
>>>       unsigned int gup_flags = FOLL_LONGTERM;
>>>       unsigned long npages, cur_base, map_pfn, last_pfn = 0;
>>> -    unsigned long locked, lock_limit, pinned, i;
>>> +    unsigned long lock_limit, sz2pin, nchunks, i;
>>>       u64 iova = msg->iova;
>>> +    long pinned;
>>>       int ret = 0;
>>>         if (vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, msg->iova,
>>>                       msg->iova + msg->size - 1))
>>>           return -EEXIST;
>>>   +    /* Limit the use of memory for bookkeeping */
>>>       page_list = (struct page **) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>>>       if (!page_list)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>> @@ -607,52 +611,64 @@ static int 
>>> vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>>           gup_flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
>>>         npages = PAGE_ALIGN(msg->size + (iova & ~PAGE_MASK)) >> 
>>> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> -    if (!npages)
>>> -        return -EINVAL;
>>> +    if (!npages) {
>>> +        ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +        goto free;
>>> +    }
>>>         mmap_read_lock(dev->mm);
>>>   -    locked = atomic64_add_return(npages, &dev->mm->pinned_vm);
>>>       lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> -
>>> -    if (locked > lock_limit) {
>>> +    if (npages + atomic64_read(&dev->mm->pinned_vm) > lock_limit) {
>>>           ret = -ENOMEM;
>>> -        goto out;
>>> +        goto unlock;
>>>       }
>>>         cur_base = msg->uaddr & PAGE_MASK;
>>>       iova &= PAGE_MASK;
>>> +    nchunks = 0;
>>>         while (npages) {
>>> -        pinned = min_t(unsigned long, npages, list_size);
>>> -        ret = pin_user_pages(cur_base, pinned,
>>> -                     gup_flags, page_list, NULL);
>>> -        if (ret != pinned)
>>> +        sz2pin = min_t(unsigned long, npages, list_size);
>>> +        pinned = pin_user_pages(cur_base, sz2pin,
>>> +                    gup_flags, page_list, NULL);
>>> +        if (sz2pin != pinned) {
>>> +            if (pinned < 0) {
>>> +                ret = pinned;
>>> +            } else {
>>> +                unpin_user_pages(page_list, pinned);
>>> +                ret = -ENOMEM;
>>> +            }
>>>               goto out;
>>> +        }
>>> +        nchunks++;
>>>             if (!last_pfn)
>>>               map_pfn = page_to_pfn(page_list[0]);
>>>   -        for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
>>> +        for (i = 0; i < pinned; i++) {
>>>               unsigned long this_pfn = page_to_pfn(page_list[i]);
>>>               u64 csize;
>>>                 if (last_pfn && (this_pfn != last_pfn + 1)) {
>>>                   /* Pin a contiguous chunk of memory */
>>>                   csize = (last_pfn - map_pfn + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> -                if (vhost_vdpa_map(v, iova, csize,
>>> -                           map_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
>>> -                           msg->perm))
>>> +                ret = vhost_vdpa_map(v, iova, csize,
>>> +                             map_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
>>> +                             msg->perm);
>>> +                if (ret)
>>>                       goto out;
>>> +
>>>                   map_pfn = this_pfn;
>>>                   iova += csize;
>>> +                nchunks = 0;
>>>               }
>>>                 last_pfn = this_pfn;
>>>           }
>>>   -        cur_base += ret << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> -        npages -= ret;
>>> +        cur_base += pinned << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> +        npages -= pinned;
>>>       }
>>>         /* Pin the rest chunk */
>>> @@ -660,10 +676,22 @@ static int 
>>> vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>>                    map_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, msg->perm);
>>>   out:
>>>       if (ret) {
>>> +        if (nchunks && last_pfn) {
>>
>>
>> Can we decrease npages where you did "nchunks++" then we can check 
>> npages here instead?
> Hmmm, I am not sure I get what you want... @nchunks gets reset to 0 
> whenever a certain range of pinned pages is successfully mapped. The 
> conditional (when nchunks is non-zero) here indicates if there's any 
> _outstanding_ pinned page that has to clean up in the error handling 
> path. While the decrement of @npages may not occur when resetting the 
> @nchunks counter, rendering incorrect cleanup in the error path.


Yes, I meant e can decrease npages where you did "nchunks++". Anyhow, 
it's just a optimization to avoid a local variable which is not a must.


>
> BTW while reviewing it I got noticed of an error in my code. There 
> might be still page pinning leak from wherever the vhost_vdpa_map() 
> error occurs towards the end of page_list. I will post a v2 to fix this.
>

Sure, will review.

Thanks


> Regards,
> -Siwei
>
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -656,8 +656,19 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct 
> vhost_vdpa *v,
>                                 ret = vhost_vdpa_map(v, iova, csize,
>                                                      map_pfn << 
> PAGE_SHIFT,
> msg->perm);
> -                               if (ret)
> +                               if (ret) {
> +                                       /*
> +                                        * Unpin the pages that are 
> left unmapped
> +                                        * from this point on in the 
> current
> +                                        * page_list. The remaining 
> outstanding
> +                                        * ones which may stride 
> across several
> +                                        * chunks will be covered in 
> the common
> +                                        * error path subsequently.
> +                                        */
> + unpin_user_pages(&page_list[i],
> +                                                        pinned - i);
>                                         goto out;
> +                               }
>
>                                 map_pfn = this_pfn;
>                                 iova += csize;
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>> +            unsigned long pfn;
>>> +
>>> +            /*
>>> +             * Unpin the outstanding pages which are unmapped.
>>> +             * Mapped pages are accounted in vdpa_map(), thus
>>> +             * will be handled by vdpa_unmap().
>>> +             */
>>> +            for (pfn = map_pfn; pfn <= last_pfn; pfn++)
>>> +                unpin_user_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>>> +        }
>>>           vhost_vdpa_unmap(v, msg->iova, msg->size);
>>> -        atomic64_sub(npages, &dev->mm->pinned_vm);
>>>       }
>>> +unlock:
>>>       mmap_read_unlock(dev->mm);
>>> +free:
>>>       free_page((unsigned long)page_list);
>>>       return ret;
>>>   }
>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ