[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201105082951.GY26150@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:29:51 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@...com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...com>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] DCMI BT656 parallel bus mode support
Hi Hugues,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 06:32:08PM +0100, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
> Add support of BT656 embedded synchronization bus.
> This mode allows to save hardware synchro lines hsync & vsync
> by replacing them with synchro codes embedded in data stream.
> Add "bus-type" property and make it required so that there is no
> ambiguity between parallel mode (bus-type=5) and BT656 mode (bus-type=6).
Thanks for the update.
Regarding the two last patches, which tree they're intended to go to?
Something else than media? I can also take them if it's ok for the
maintainer of the "right" tree.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists