linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] irqchip/sunxi-nmi: Add support for the V3s NMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201105112418.GA1237@collins>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:24:18 +0100
From:   Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Matteo Scordino <matteo.scordino@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] irqchip/sunxi-nmi: Add support for the V3s NMI

Hi Samuel,

On Wed 04 Nov 20, 22:14, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 11/3/20 2:50 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > The V3s/V3 has a NMI IRQ controller, which is mainly used for the AXP209
> > interrupt. In great wisdom, Allwinner decided to invert the enable and
> > pending register offsets, compared to the A20.
> > 
> > As a result, a specific compatible and register description is required
> > for the V3s. This was tested with an AXP209 on a V3 board.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
> > ---
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-sunxi-nmi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sunxi-nmi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sunxi-nmi.c
> > index a412b5d5d0fa..59e0e4612ef7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sunxi-nmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sunxi-nmi.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
> >  #define SUN7I_NMI_PENDING	0x04
> >  #define SUN7I_NMI_ENABLE	0x08
> >  
> > +#define SUN8I_V3S_NMI_CTRL	0x00
> > +#define SUN8I_V3S_NMI_ENABLE	0x04
> > +#define SUN8I_V3S_NMI_PENDING	0x08
> > +
> >  #define SUN9I_NMI_CTRL		0x00
> >  #define SUN9I_NMI_ENABLE	0x04
> >  #define SUN9I_NMI_PENDING	0x08
> 
> These two sets of definitions are the same. So it would make sense for
> V3S and sun9i to share a configuration, instead of creating a copy.

Oh but that's true! I initially though it was the same as sun7i, found that it
wasn't but didn't notice about sun9i.

So I think we can just use the sun9i compatible after all.

Thanks!

Paul

> > @@ -79,6 +83,12 @@ static const struct sunxi_sc_nmi_reg_offs sun7i_reg_offs __initconst = {
> >  	.enable	= SUN7I_NMI_ENABLE,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct sunxi_sc_nmi_reg_offs sun8i_v3s_reg_offs __initconst = {
> > +	.ctrl	= SUN8I_V3S_NMI_CTRL,
> > +	.pend	= SUN8I_V3S_NMI_PENDING,
> > +	.enable	= SUN8I_V3S_NMI_ENABLE,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct sunxi_sc_nmi_reg_offs sun9i_reg_offs __initconst = {
> >  	.ctrl	= SUN9I_NMI_CTRL,
> >  	.pend	= SUN9I_NMI_PENDING,
> > @@ -165,7 +175,6 @@ static int __init sunxi_sc_nmi_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> >  	unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -
> >  	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, 1, &irq_generic_chip_ops, NULL);
> >  	if (!domain) {
> >  		pr_err("Could not register interrupt domain.\n");
> > @@ -254,6 +263,13 @@ static int __init sun7i_sc_nmi_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> >  }
> >  IRQCHIP_DECLARE(sun7i_sc_nmi, "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi", sun7i_sc_nmi_irq_init);
> >  
> > +static int __init sun8i_v3s_sc_nmi_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> > +					    struct device_node *parent)
> > +{
> > +	return sunxi_sc_nmi_irq_init(node, &sun8i_v3s_reg_offs);
> > +}
> > +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(sun8i_v3s_sc_nmi, "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-sc-nmi", sun8i_v3s_sc_nmi_irq_init);
> > +
> >  static int __init sun9i_nmi_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> >  				     struct device_node *parent)
> >  {
> > 
> 

-- 
Developer of free digital technology and hardware support.

Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)