[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdayhrcfyXEB4P+apjOyF=8DZgmu=_H8+aQEr4XEbB0NeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:57:44 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Remove hole in pinctrl_gpio_range
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:51 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> On 64-bit platforms, pointer size and alignment are 64-bit, hence two
> 4-byte holes are present before the pins and gc members of the
> pinctrl_gpio_range structure. Get rid of these holes by moving the
> pins pointer.
>
> This reduces kernel size of an arm64 Rockchip kernel by ca. 512 bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> Compile-tested only (arm/multi_v7_defconfig and arm64/defconfig).
Patch applied.
Do you think it'd be worth it to add a check to checkpatch to suggest
to move pointers toward the end of any struct?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists