lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 22:04:49 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:54 PM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
> the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
>
> Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
> i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ