[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DvnjV8jPAGv8kOTPrXm8o1WiCA=LpOA8+D0=qMOc96=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 22:04:49 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:54 PM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
> the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
>
> Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
> i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists