linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:21:49 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:54:18AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
> the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
> 
> Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
> i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>

Applied, thanks.