lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:47:52 +0100 From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/9] bpf: Fix tests for local_storage From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com> The {inode,sk}_storage_result checking if the correct value was retrieved was being clobbered unconditionally by the return value of the bpf_{inode,sk}_storage_delete call. Also, consistently use the newly added BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE flag. Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> Fixes: cd324d7abb3d ("bpf: Add selftests for local_storage") Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c | 24 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c index 0758ba229ae0..09529e33be98 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c @@ -58,20 +58,22 @@ int BPF_PROG(unlink_hook, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *victim) { __u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; struct dummy_storage *storage; + int err; if (pid != monitored_pid) return 0; storage = bpf_inode_storage_get(&inode_storage_map, victim->d_inode, 0, - BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); + BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); if (!storage) return 0; - if (storage->value == DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE) + if (storage->value != DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE) inode_storage_result = -1; - inode_storage_result = - bpf_inode_storage_delete(&inode_storage_map, victim->d_inode); + err = bpf_inode_storage_delete(&inode_storage_map, victim->d_inode); + if (!err) + inode_storage_result = err; return 0; } @@ -82,19 +84,23 @@ int BPF_PROG(socket_bind, struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address, { __u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; struct dummy_storage *storage; + int err; if (pid != monitored_pid) return 0; storage = bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk, 0, - BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); + BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); if (!storage) return 0; - if (storage->value == DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE) + if (storage->value != DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE) sk_storage_result = -1; - sk_storage_result = bpf_sk_storage_delete(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk); + err = bpf_sk_storage_delete(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk); + if (!err) + sk_storage_result = err; + return 0; } @@ -109,7 +115,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(socket_post_create, struct socket *sock, int family, int type, return 0; storage = bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk, 0, - BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); + BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); if (!storage) return 0; @@ -131,7 +137,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(file_open, struct file *file) return 0; storage = bpf_inode_storage_get(&inode_storage_map, file->f_inode, 0, - BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); + BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); if (!storage) return 0; -- 2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists