linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/9] bpf: Fix tests for local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201105144755.214341-7-kpsingh@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu,  5 Nov 2020 15:47:52 +0100
From:   KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/9] bpf: Fix tests for local_storage

From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>

The {inode,sk}_storage_result checking if the correct value was retrieved
was being clobbered unconditionally by the return value of the
bpf_{inode,sk}_storage_delete call.

Also, consistently use the newly added BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE
flag.

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Fixes: cd324d7abb3d ("bpf: Add selftests for local_storage")
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c       | 24 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c
index 0758ba229ae0..09529e33be98 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c
@@ -58,20 +58,22 @@ int BPF_PROG(unlink_hook, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *victim)
 {
 	__u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
 	struct dummy_storage *storage;
+	int err;
 
 	if (pid != monitored_pid)
 		return 0;
 
 	storage = bpf_inode_storage_get(&inode_storage_map, victim->d_inode, 0,
-				     BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
+					BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
 	if (!storage)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (storage->value == DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE)
+	if (storage->value != DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE)
 		inode_storage_result = -1;
 
-	inode_storage_result =
-		bpf_inode_storage_delete(&inode_storage_map, victim->d_inode);
+	err = bpf_inode_storage_delete(&inode_storage_map, victim->d_inode);
+	if (!err)
+		inode_storage_result = err;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -82,19 +84,23 @@ int BPF_PROG(socket_bind, struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address,
 {
 	__u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
 	struct dummy_storage *storage;
+	int err;
 
 	if (pid != monitored_pid)
 		return 0;
 
 	storage = bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk, 0,
-				     BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
+				     BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
 	if (!storage)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (storage->value == DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE)
+	if (storage->value != DUMMY_STORAGE_VALUE)
 		sk_storage_result = -1;
 
-	sk_storage_result = bpf_sk_storage_delete(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk);
+	err = bpf_sk_storage_delete(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk);
+	if (!err)
+		sk_storage_result = err;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -109,7 +115,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(socket_post_create, struct socket *sock, int family, int type,
 		return 0;
 
 	storage = bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_storage_map, sock->sk, 0,
-				     BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
+				     BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
 	if (!storage)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -131,7 +137,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(file_open, struct file *file)
 		return 0;
 
 	storage = bpf_inode_storage_get(&inode_storage_map, file->f_inode, 0,
-				     BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
+					BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
 	if (!storage)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog