[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201106074020.GT4488@dell>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:40:20 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
Stefan Gmeiner <riddlebox@...esurf.ch>,
"C. Scott Ananian" <cananian@...mni.priceton.edu>,
Bruce Kalk <kall@...pass.com>,
this to <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/20] input: mouse: synaptics: Place braces around empty
if() body
On Thu, 05 Nov 2020, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 04:24:17PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >
> > drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c: In function ‘synaptics_process_packet’:
> > drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c:1110:6: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
> >
> > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > Cc: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>
> > Cc: Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>
> > Cc: Stefan Gmeiner <riddlebox@...esurf.ch>
> > Cc: "C. Scott Ananian" <cananian@...mni.priceton.edu>
> > Cc: Bruce Kalk <kall@...pass.com>
> > Cc: this to <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c b/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c
> > index 82577095e175e..07835939d83b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c
> > @@ -1106,8 +1106,9 @@ static void synaptics_process_packet(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> > num_fingers = hw.w + 2;
> > break;
> > case 2:
> > - if (SYN_MODEL_PEN(info->model_id))
> > + if (SYN_MODEL_PEN(info->model_id)) {
> > ; /* Nothing, treat a pen as a single finger */
> > + }
>
> This gives me:
>
> WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
>
> from checkpatch.
Yes, because checkpatch just sees it as a normal single statement,
rather than an empty one. It complains about macros that can be
compiled out too, which is even more dangerous.
GCC wins this one though, as it *knows* it's an empty statement.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists