linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/mce: remove unused WARN_ON() in mce_register_decode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201106111220.GA14914@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:12:20 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/mce: remove unused WARN_ON() in
 mce_register_decode_chain()

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 04:43:40PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> enum mce_notifier_prios {
>         MCE_PRIO_LOWEST,
>         MCE_PRIO_MCELOG,
>         MCE_PRIO_EDAC,
> 
> After commit c9c6d216ed28 ("x86/mce: Rename "first" function as "early""),
> there is no other integer between MCE_PRIO_MCELOG and MCE_PRIO_EDAC.
> Therefore, the WARN_ON() will never be triggered, just delete it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> index 4102b866e7c0..914f9f102995 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> @@ -162,9 +162,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mce_log);
>  
>  void mce_register_decode_chain(struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
> -	if (WARN_ON(nb->priority > MCE_PRIO_MCELOG && nb->priority < MCE_PRIO_EDAC))
> -		return;

No, you don't want to remove it - you want to update it so that it
catches wrong priorities...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette