linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: remove unneeded break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201108175945.GA1508644@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Sun, 8 Nov 2020 18:59:45 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     trix@...hat.com
Cc:     tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...ux.ie,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, gustavoars@...nel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kraxel@...hat.com, spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        airlied@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        bskeggs@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: remove unneeded break

Hi Tom
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:06:41PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Tom
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:31:15AM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> > 
> > A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return or break
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> 
> Looks good and builds with no warnings.
> 
> One of the diffs made me - "oh this looks wrong". But after I looked again
> it was right and the resulting code is more readable - so good.
> 
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> 
> Was tempted to just apply to drm-misc-next but will give others the
> opportunity to chime in.

Thanks.
Now applied to drm-misc-next - will show up in -next in a week or so.

	Sam