linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: fix compat F2FS_IOC_{MOVE, GARBAGE_COLLECT}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 10:12:04 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: fix compat F2FS_IOC_{MOVE,
 GARBAGE_COLLECT}_RANGE

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:29:25AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Oh I see, the cp-related checks are at the beginning of f2fs_ioctl() too.
> > 
> > In that case a much better approach would be to add __f2fs_ioctl() which is
> > called by f2fs_ioctl() and f2fs_compat_ioctl(), and have f2fs_ioctl() and
> > f2fs_compat_ioctl() do the cp-related checks but not __f2fs_ioctl().
> 
> Will this cleanup make sense to you?

I think it would be better to do it the way I suggested.

- Eric