[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201109191410.wjywxb5c6ylvekom@linux-p48b.lan>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:14:10 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/mos7720: process deferred urbs in a workqueue
On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, den 05.11.2020, 22:17 -0800 schrieb Davidlohr Bueso:
>> @@ -1888,16 +1732,8 @@ static void mos7720_release(struct usb_serial *serial)
>> usb_set_serial_data(serial, NULL);
>> mos_parport->serial = NULL;
>>
>> - /* if tasklet currently scheduled, wait for it to complete */
>> - tasklet_kill(&mos_parport->urb_tasklet);
>> -
>> - /* unlink any urbs sent by the tasklet */
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&mos_parport->listlock, flags);
>> - list_for_each_entry(urbtrack,
>> - &mos_parport->active_urbs,
>> - urblist_entry)
>> - usb_unlink_urb(urbtrack->urb);
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mos_parport->listlock, flags);
>> + /* if work is currently scheduled, wait for it to complete */
>> + cancel_work_sync(&mos_parport->work);
>> parport_del_port(mos_parport->pp);
>>
>> kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
>
>Hi,
>
>do you really want to cancel as opposed to wait for work in release()?
Well I tried to maintain the current semantics here. tasklet_kill() is
equivalent to cancel_work_sync() in that they both wait for the delayed
execution to finish running and guarantee that it is no longer queued.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists