[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <574f338f6f0b81fe1e4109f74c6dfcb45aca0d53.camel@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:22:16 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/mos7720: process deferred urbs in a workqueue
Am Donnerstag, den 05.11.2020, 22:17 -0800 schrieb Davidlohr Bueso:
> @@ -1888,16 +1732,8 @@ static void mos7720_release(struct usb_serial *serial)
> usb_set_serial_data(serial, NULL);
> mos_parport->serial = NULL;
>
> - /* if tasklet currently scheduled, wait for it to complete */
> - tasklet_kill(&mos_parport->urb_tasklet);
> -
> - /* unlink any urbs sent by the tasklet */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&mos_parport->listlock, flags);
> - list_for_each_entry(urbtrack,
> - &mos_parport->active_urbs,
> - urblist_entry)
> - usb_unlink_urb(urbtrack->urb);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mos_parport->listlock, flags);
> + /* if work is currently scheduled, wait for it to complete */
> + cancel_work_sync(&mos_parport->work);
> parport_del_port(mos_parport->pp);
>
> kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
Hi,
do you really want to cancel as opposed to wait for work in release()?
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists