linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Add pinctrl driver for Microsemi Serial GPIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VfZRJuzvaYs-CKvxitfOxcNc-7j8MZA7FQvN0SQrPK6cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:26:18 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Add pinctrl
 driver for Microsemi Serial GPIO

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:52 AM Lars Povlsen
<lars.povlsen@...rochip.com> wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:51 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:27 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com> wrote:

...

> >> >> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> >
> >> > Are you sure? IIRC internally we are using ENOTSUPP.
> >> >
> >> > Couple of drivers seem to be wrongly using the other one.
> >>
> >> Checkpatch complains about ENOTSUPP:
> >>
> >> # ENOTSUPP is not a standard error code and should be avoided in new patches.
> >> # Folks usually mean EOPNOTSUPP (also called ENOTSUP), when they type ENOTSUPP.
> >
> > checkpatch is wrong if this is internal code and to me sounds like
> > it's not going out of the kernel.
> >
> > ...
>
> As it appears there are different opinions on this I'll let the pinctrl
> maintainer decide.

There are no other opinions.
Read description of struct pinconf_ops and fix the code.
checkpatch is simply wrong here.

> >> >> +                       err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> >
> >> > Ditto.
> >>
> >> Ditto.
> >
> > Ditto.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko