linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] reboot: Fix variable assignments in type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201112151320.e0153ace2f2eb5b59eabbdcb@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:13:20 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com, arnd@...db.de, keescook@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        pasha.tatashin@...een.com, pmladek@...e.com, rppt@...nel.org,
        tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reboot: Fix variable assignments in type_store

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:50:23 -0700 Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:

> Clang warns:
> 
> kernel/reboot.c:707:17: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration
> type 'enum reboot_type' to different enumeration type 'enum reboot_mode'
> [-Wenum-conversion]
>                 reboot_mode = BOOT_TRIPLE;
>                             ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -704,19 +704,19 @@ static ssize_t type_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  		return -EPERM;
>  
>  	if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_TRIPLE_STR, strlen(BOOT_TRIPLE_STR)))
> -		reboot_mode = BOOT_TRIPLE;
> +		reboot_type = BOOT_TRIPLE;
>  	else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_KBD_STR, strlen(BOOT_KBD_STR)))
> -		reboot_mode = BOOT_KBD;
> +		reboot_type = BOOT_KBD;
>  	else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_BIOS_STR, strlen(BOOT_BIOS_STR)))
> -		reboot_mode = BOOT_BIOS;
> +		reboot_type = BOOT_BIOS;
>  	else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_ACPI_STR, strlen(BOOT_ACPI_STR)))
> -		reboot_mode = BOOT_ACPI;
> +		reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI;
>  	else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_EFI_STR, strlen(BOOT_EFI_STR)))
> -		reboot_mode = BOOT_EFI;
> +		reboot_type = BOOT_EFI;
>  	else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_CF9_FORCE_STR, strlen(BOOT_CF9_FORCE_STR)))
> -		reboot_mode = BOOT_CF9_FORCE;
> +		reboot_type = BOOT_CF9_FORCE;
>  	else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_CF9_SAFE_STR, strlen(BOOT_CF9_SAFE_STR)))
> -		reboot_mode = BOOT_CF9_SAFE;
> +		reboot_type = BOOT_CF9_SAFE;
>  	else
>  		return -EINVAL;

This is a fairly dramatic change to the original patch, but it eyeballs
OK.

Matteo, could you please comment?  And preferably retest?