[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874kltmlfr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:32:40 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Tian\, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Wilk\, Konrad" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: "Raj\, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
"Williams\, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Jiang\, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"vkoul\@kernel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"Dey\, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>,
"maz\@kernel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"bhelgaas\@google.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"alex.williamson\@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Pan\, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Liu\, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Lu\, Baolu" <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
"Kumar\, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Luck\, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"kwankhede\@nvidia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"eric.auger\@redhat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"parav\@mellanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"rafael\@kernel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"netanelg\@mellanox.com" <netanelg@...lanox.com>,
"shahafs\@mellanox.com" <shahafs@...lanox.com>,
"yan.y.zhao\@linux.intel.com" <yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com>,
"pbonzini\@redhat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Ortiz\, Samuel" <samuel.ortiz@...el.com>,
"Hossain\, Mona" <mona.hossain@...el.com>,
"dmaengine\@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 06/17] PCI: add SIOV and IMS capability detection
On Fri, Nov 13 2020 at 02:42, Kevin Tian wrote:
>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CPUID#1_ECX is a x86 thing. Do we need to figure out probably_on_
> bare_metal for every architecture altogether, or is it OK to just
> handle it for x86 arch at this stage? Based on previous discussions
> ims is just one piece of multiple technologies to enable SIOV-like
> scalability. Ideally arch-specific enablement beyond ims (e.g. the
> IOMMU part) will be required for such scaled usage thus we
> may just leave ims disabled for non-x86 and wait until that time to
> figure out arch specific probably_on_bare_metal?
Of course is this not only an x86 problem. Every architecture which
supports virtualization has the same issue. ARM(64) has no way to tell
for sure whether the machine runs bare metal either. No idea about the
other architectures.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists