linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/19] Second step support for A100

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201110125536.gxxbgzkh3tlmn2ze@gilmour.lan>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:55:36 +0100
From:   maxime@...no.tech
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, kishon@...com,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, dianders@...omium.org,
        marex@...x.de, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        rdunlap@...radead.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        rikard.falkeborn@...il.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:SECURE DIGITAL HO..." <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Second step support for A100

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:18:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 10-11-20, 16:51, Frank Lee wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 07:00, Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It seems that sending too many e-mails at one time will cause some
> > > > emails to fail to be sent out. I will try again.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Instead please reduce the address list to relevant people, as pointed
> > > out by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. Don't Cc irrelevant developers
> > > unless a file is abandoned and you need to get as much audience as
> > > possible... but sunxi is not abandoned.
> > 
> > Thank you for the reminder. I resend the version in the afternoon,
> > only CC the relevant people. I'm not sure. Should the cover be copied
> > to everyone?
> 
> Any reason why this should be a single series.. why not split it to
> bunch of chunks, one per subsystem like pinctrl, phy, dmaengine, etc...
> And then DTS parts and CC relevant list and maintainers. I do not think
> there is any dependency, right?

Yeah, I agree.

One series should be about one topic, so you should have at least:
  - One for the pinctrl fixes
  - One for the DMA controller and related DT patches
  - One for the MMC controller and related DT patches
  - One for the USB controllers and related DT patches
    * And for the PHY, the enable_pmu_unk1 and devm_* patches should be
      sent independently as well
  - One for the watchdog
  - And the PMU patch should be sent independently too

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)