linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] nvme-pic: improve max I/O queue handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:52:05 +0100
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] nvme-pic: improve max I/O queue handling



On 11/13/20 5:25 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 02:15:59PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/20 6:36 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:45:35PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>>>> You got to get something wrong, I hope in this case it's just the subject
>>>> of the cover letter :D
>>>
>>> I suppose the change logs could be worded a little better :)
>>
>> Do you think I should send a v2 with an improved message?
>> I just realized I'm pretty alone (and wrong) in starting
>> the commit message body lower case too.
> 
> I'll pull in soon, no need to resend.
> 

Thanks, appreciate your effort!