[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201113170043.osr63jash7anc3xn@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:00:43 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] checkpatch: document the function renaming and
deprecation around devm_ioremap_resource
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 08:36:44AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 10:11 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > this can also be squashed into the respective patches instead.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> >
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -615,6 +615,11 @@ our %deprecated_apis = (
> > "rcu_barrier_sched" => "rcu_barrier",
> > "get_state_synchronize_sched" => "get_state_synchronize_rcu",
> > "cond_synchronize_sched" => "cond_synchronize_rcu",
> > + "devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource" => "devm_platform_get_request_and_ioremap_resource",
>
> Do we really need 46 character length function names?
I can drop the "_and" and maybe "_get", so we're down to 38 "only".
Other than that I think all name parts are relevant.
> > + "devm_platform_ioremap_resource" => "devm_platform_request_ioremap_resource",
> > + "devm_platform_ioremap_resource_wc" => "devm_platform_request_ioremap_resource_wc",
> > + "devm_ioremap_resource" => "devm_request_ioremap_resource",
> > + "devm_ioremap_resource_wc" => "devm_request_ioremap_resource_wc",
> > );
> >
> >
> > #Create a search pattern for all these strings to speed up a loop below
>
> And do please send your proposed patches to the appropriate maintainers.
Yes, sure. This patch 3/2 was only a quick shot and it was already clear
to me that I have to redo it. I want to squash this change in the patch
that does the actual renaming, I assume that's fine for you?!
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists