[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rgua2zv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 19:28:36 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org, arnd@...db.de,
luto@...capital.net, wad@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
paul@...l-moore.com, eparis@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] kernel: entry: Expose helpers to migrate TIF to SYSCALL_WORK flags
On Sat, Nov 14 2020 at 11:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY
>> +static inline void __set_task_syscall_work(struct thread_info *ti, int flag)
>> +{
>> + set_bit(flag, (unsigned long *)&ti->syscall_work);
>> +}
>> +static inline int __test_task_syscall_work(struct thread_info *ti, int flag)
>> +{
>> + return test_bit(flag, (unsigned long *)&ti->syscall_work);
>> +}
>> +static inline void __clear_task_syscall_work(struct thread_info *ti, int flag)
>> +{
>> + return clear_bit(flag, (unsigned long *)&ti->syscall_work);
>
> The casts here look bogus.
Making sure that &(unsigned long) results in a pointer to unsigned long
is indeed silly.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists