[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201116145850.GC3121429@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:58:50 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, corbet@....net,
keescook@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 03:49:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:03:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > I think almost all of this information should go into atomic_ops.rst
>
> No, we should delete atomic_ops.rst. It's bitrotted nonsense. The only
Sod it, I'll just queue a deletion. That'll stop people from trying to
update the trainwreck.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists