lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:50:15 -0700 From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> Cc: corbet@....net, keescook@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops On 11/16/20 7:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 03:49:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:03:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> I think almost all of this information should go into atomic_ops.rst >> >> No, we should delete atomic_ops.rst. It's bitrotted nonsense. The only > > Sod it, I'll just queue a deletion. That'll stop people from trying to > update the trainwreck. > Please don't delete the document. This is one of the documents that has the information to make decisions about the api usage. atomic_t information is spread out in various Doc directories. It should be consolidated, instead of removing files. thanks, -- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists