[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <050d5555-f8b4-f54d-e13c-149815b1b64c@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:50:15 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: corbet@....net, keescook@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops
On 11/16/20 7:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 03:49:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:03:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> I think almost all of this information should go into atomic_ops.rst
>>
>> No, we should delete atomic_ops.rst. It's bitrotted nonsense. The only
>
> Sod it, I'll just queue a deletion. That'll stop people from trying to
> update the trainwreck.
>
Please don't delete the document. This is one of the documents that has
the information to make decisions about the api usage.
atomic_t information is spread out in various Doc directories. It should
be consolidated, instead of removing files.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists