[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201117152135.GO3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:21:35 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, corbet@....net,
keescook@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 07:50:15AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 11/16/20 7:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 03:49:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:03:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > I think almost all of this information should go into atomic_ops.rst
> > >
> > > No, we should delete atomic_ops.rst. It's bitrotted nonsense. The only
> >
> > Sod it, I'll just queue a deletion. That'll stop people from trying to
> > update the trainwreck.
> >
>
> Please don't delete the document. This is one of the documents that has
> the information to make decisions about the api usage.
>
> atomic_t information is spread out in various Doc directories. It should
> be consolidated, instead of removing files.
It is gone.. Please read Documentation/atomic_*.txt if you want to know
about atomic_t or bitops.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists