linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 12/12] vdpa_sim_blk: implement ramdisk behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201117143258.kfm7jhkofwavq6p6@steredhat>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:32:58 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Cc:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 12/12] vdpa_sim_blk: implement ramdisk behaviour

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:36:36AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 02:47:12PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c
>> index 8e41b3ab98d5..68e74383322f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>   */
>>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
>>  #include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h>
>>
>>  #include "vdpa_sim.h"
>> @@ -24,10 +25,137 @@
>>
>>  static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_blk_dev;
>>
>> +static int vdpasim_blk_handle_req(struct vdpasim *vdpasim,
>> +				  struct vdpasim_virtqueue *vq)
>
>This function has a non-standard int return value. Please document it.

Yes, I'll do.

>
>> +{
>> +	size_t wrote = 0, to_read = 0, to_write = 0;
>> +	struct virtio_blk_outhdr hdr;
>> +	uint8_t status;
>> +	uint32_t type;
>> +	ssize_t bytes;
>> +	loff_t offset;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	vringh_kiov_cleanup(&vq->riov);
>> +	vringh_kiov_cleanup(&vq->wiov);
>> +
>> +	ret = vringh_getdesc_iotlb(&vq->vring, &vq->riov, &vq->wiov,
>> +				   &vq->head, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +	if (ret != 1)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < vq->wiov.used; i++)
>> +		to_write += vq->wiov.iov[i].iov_len;
>> +	to_write -= 1; /* last byte is the status */
>
>What if vq->wiov.used == 0?

Right, we should discard the descriptor.

>
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < vq->riov.used; i++)
>> +		to_read += vq->riov.iov[i].iov_len;
>> +
>> +	bytes = vringh_iov_pull_iotlb(&vq->vring, &vq->riov, &hdr, sizeof(hdr));
>> +	if (bytes != sizeof(hdr))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	to_read -= bytes;
>> +
>> +	type = le32_to_cpu(hdr.type);
>> +	offset = le64_to_cpu(hdr.sector) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> +	status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK;
>> +
>> +	switch (type) {
>> +	case VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN:
>> +		if (offset + to_write > VDPASIM_BLK_CAPACITY << SECTOR_SHIFT) {
>
>Integer overflow is not handled.

I'll fix.

Thanks,
Stefano