[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4d87b99-5a5b-e7de-e72a-18407a875aeb@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:04:57 +0530
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
"amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk" <amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kthota@...dia.com" <kthota@...dia.com>,
"mmaddireddy@...dia.com" <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>,
"sagar.tv@...il.com" <sagar.tv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add support to handle prefetchable memoryg
On 11/17/2020 5:40 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:08:35AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> Hi Lorenzo & Bjorn,
>> Sorry to bother you.
>> Could you please take a look at the patches-1 & 2 from this series?
>
> IIUC we should:
>
> (1) apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20201026181652.418729-1-robh@kernel.org
> (2) apply [1,2] from this series
>
> For (2), are they rebased against v5.10-rc3 with (1) applied ? I need to
> check but I will probably have to use v5.10-rc3 as baseline owing to
> commit:
>
> 9fff3256f93d
>
> (1) depends on it.
>
> Lorenzo
My patches [1,2] from this series apply cleanly on v5.10-rc3. But with
(1) applied first, there is a trivial rebase required. Let me know if
you want me to send the trivial rebased version (of patch-2 particularly).
Thanks,
Vidya Sagar
>
>> Thanks,
>> Vidya Sagar
>>
>> On 11/4/2020 1:16 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> Lorenzo / Bjorn,
>>> Could you please review patches-1 & 2 in this series?
>>> For the third patch, we already went with Rob's patch @
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20201026154852.221483-1-robh@kernel.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vidya Sagar
>>>
>>> On 10/26/2020 6:02 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 04:03:41AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>>>> On 10/23/20, 3:57 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series adds support for configuring the DesignWare IP's ATU
>>>>>> region for prefetchable memory translations.
>>>>>> It first starts by flagging a warning if the size of non-prefetchable
>>>>>> aperture goes beyond 32-bit as PCIe spec doesn't allow it.
>>>>>> And then adds required support for programming the ATU to handle higher
>>>>>> (i.e. >4GB) sizes and then finally adds support for differentiating
>>>>>> between prefetchable and non-prefetchable regions and
>>>>>> configuring one of
>>>>>> the ATU regions for prefetchable memory translations purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vidya Sagar (3):
>>>>>> PCI: of: Warn if non-prefetchable memory aperture size is > 32-bit
>>>>>> PCI: dwc: Add support to program ATU for >4GB memory aperture sizes
>>>>>> PCI: dwc: Add support to handle prefetchable memory mapping
>>>>>
>>>>> For 2nd & 3rd,
>>>>> Acked-by: Jingoo <jingoohan1@...il.com>
>>>>> But, I still want someone to ack 1st patch, not me.
>>>>>
>>>>> To Vidya,
>>>>> If possible, can you ask your coworker to give 'Tested-by'? It
>>>>> will be very helpful.
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> On next-20201026 (but also going back quite a while) I'm seeing this
>>>> during boot on Jetson AGX Xavier (Tegra194):
>>>>
>>>> [ 3.493382] ahci 0001:01:00.0: version 3.0
>>>> [ 3.493889] ahci 0001:01:00.0: SSS flag set, parallel bus scan
>>>> disabled
>>>> [ 4.497706] ahci 0001:01:00.0: controller reset failed (0xffffffff)
>>>> [ 4.498114] ahci: probe of 0001:01:00.0 failed with error -5
>>>>
>>>> After applying this series, AHCI over PCI is back to normal:
>>>>
>>>> [ 3.543230] ahci 0001:01:00.0: AHCI 0001.0000 32 slots 1 ports 6
>>>> Gbps 0x1 impl SATA mode
>>>> [ 3.550841] ahci 0001:01:00.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf led only pmp
>>>> fbs pio slum part sxs
>>>> [ 3.559747] scsi host0: ahci
>>>> [ 3.561998] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m512@...230010000 port
>>>> 0x1230010100 irq 63
>>>>
>>>> So for the series:
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists