[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201118102948.GA27765@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:29:48 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
"amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk" <amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kthota@...dia.com" <kthota@...dia.com>,
"mmaddireddy@...dia.com" <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>,
"sagar.tv@...il.com" <sagar.tv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add support to handle prefetchable memory
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:04:57PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
[...]
> > IIUC we should:
> >
> > (1) apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20201026181652.418729-1-robh@kernel.org
> > (2) apply [1,2] from this series
> >
> > For (2), are they rebased against v5.10-rc3 with (1) applied ? I need to
> > check but I will probably have to use v5.10-rc3 as baseline owing to
> > commit:
> >
> > 9fff3256f93d
> >
> > (1) depends on it.
> >
> > Lorenzo
> My patches [1,2] from this series apply cleanly on v5.10-rc3. But with (1)
> applied first, there is a trivial rebase required. Let me know if you want
> me to send the trivial rebased version (of patch-2 particularly).
Please do - I shall apply (1) first (on top of v5.10-rc3).
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists