linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/lru: simplify is_file_lru() and is_active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:56:58 +0800
From:   Hui Su <sh_def@....com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/lru: simplify is_file_lru() and is_active_lru()

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 05:47:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 01:46:33AM +0800, Hui Su wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 05:41:17PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 01:12:42AM +0800, Hui Su wrote:
> > > > lru_list lru bit 0 can tell whether the list is
> > > > avtive lru-list or not.
> > > > lru_list lru bit 1 can tell whether the list is
> > > > file lru-list or not.
> > > > 
> > > > And fix some define type in shrink_active_list()
> > > > and get_scan_count().
> > > > 
> > > > v1->v2:
> > > > correct the commit message, and fix the define type.
> > > 
> > > No, still incorrect.
> > 
> > I am a little confused, can you tell in detail?
> 
> Have you booted a kernel with this change?  Have you run any kind of
> tests on it?

Yes, I boot it with qemu-system-x86_64-4.1.50 on ubuntu20.04:
qemu-system-x86_64 -kernel /home/rlk/workspace/compile/out/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage -hda \
 /home/rlk/myspace/qemu_build/rootfs.img -append "root=/dev/sda console=ttyS0" -nographic

using the kernel compiled with ubuntu20.04's default .config.

It seems nothing abnormal.
And i did not do other test.