[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c95f0d5-c543-a5bf-b3b6-df5c7a6f6c3c@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:29:21 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] x86/resctrl: Add a separate schema list for resctrl
Hi James,
On 10/30/2020 9:11 AM, James Morse wrote:
> To support multiple architectures, the resctrl code needs to be split
> into a 'fs' specific part in core code, and an arch-specific backend.
>
> It should be difficult for the arch-specific backends to diverge,
> supporting slightly different ABIs for user-space. For example,
> generating, parsing and validating the schema configuration values
> should be done in what becomes the core code to prevent divergence.
> Today, the schema emerge from which entries in the rdt_resources_all
> array the arch code has chosen to enable.
>
> Start by creating a struct resctrl_schema, which will eventually hold
> the name and pending configuration values for resctrl.
Looking ahead I am not able to identify the "pending configuration
values" that will eventually be held in resctrl_schema. With entire
series applied there is the name, type, num_closid, and pointer to the
resource.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 9 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index f7aab9245259..682e84aebd14 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ extern unsigned int resctrl_cqm_threshold;
> extern bool rdt_alloc_capable;
> extern bool rdt_mon_capable;
> extern unsigned int rdt_mon_features;
> +extern struct list_head resctrl_all_schema;
Considering the relationship with rdt_resources_all it seems more
consistent to call it resctrl_schema_all?
>
> enum rdt_group_type {
> RDTCTRL_GROUP = 0,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index df10135f021e..f79a5e548138 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ static struct kernfs_root *rdt_root;
> struct rdtgroup rdtgroup_default;
> LIST_HEAD(rdt_all_groups);
>
> +/* list of entries for the schemata file */
> +LIST_HEAD(resctrl_all_schema);
> +
> /* Kernel fs node for "info" directory under root */
> static struct kernfs_node *kn_info;
>
> @@ -2117,6 +2120,35 @@ static int rdt_enable_ctx(struct rdt_fs_context *ctx)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int create_schemata_list(void)
> +{
Could you please use the new namespace (schema_list_) as a prefix
instead of suffix? That will make it easier to search.
> + struct resctrl_schema *s;
> + struct rdt_resource *r;
> +
> + for_each_alloc_enabled_rdt_resource(r) {
> + s = kzalloc(sizeof(*s), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!s)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + s->res = r;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->list);
> + list_add(&s->list, &resctrl_all_schema);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void destroy_schemata_list(void)
> +{
> + struct resctrl_schema *s, *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(s, tmp, &resctrl_all_schema, list) {
> + list_del(&s->list);
> + kfree(s);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
> {
> struct rdt_fs_context *ctx = rdt_fc2context(fc);
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index dfb0f32b73a1..de6cbc725753 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ struct rdt_resource {
>
> };
>
> +/**
Missing a kernel-doc description here
> + * @list: Member of resctrl's schema list
> + * @res: The rdt_resource for this entry
> + */
> +struct resctrl_schema {
> + struct list_head list;
> + struct rdt_resource *res;
> +};
> +
> /* The number of closid supported by this resource regardless of CDP */
> u32 resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(struct rdt_resource *r);
>
>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists