linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:38:56 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Bongsu Jeon <bs.jeon87@...il.com>
Cc:     Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@...sung.com>,
        "linux-nfc@...ts.01.org" <linux-nfc@...ts.01.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max_payload

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 09:14, Bongsu Jeon <bs.jeon87@...il.com> wrote:
>
> 2020-11-17 16:42 GMT+09:00, krzk@...nel.org <krzk@...nel.org>:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:16:11AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> >> max_payload is unused.
> >
> > Why did you resend the patch ignoring my review? I already provided you
> > with a tag, so you should include it.
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
>
> Sorry about that. I included the tag.

You need to reduce the rate of sending new patches. You sent v1. Then
you sent again v1, which I reviewed. Then you send v2 without my
review. So I provided a review. Then you sent again a v2 with my
reviewed tags. So there are two v1 patches and two v2. Since I
provided you the review tags for v2, no need to send v2 again. It
confuses.

Best regards,
Krzysztof