linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:52:45 +0900
From:   Bongsu Jeon <bs.jeon87@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@...sung.com>,
        "linux-nfc@...ts.01.org" <linux-nfc@...ts.01.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max_payload

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:39 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 09:14, Bongsu Jeon <bs.jeon87@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > 2020-11-17 16:42 GMT+09:00, krzk@...nel.org <krzk@...nel.org>:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:16:11AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> > >> max_payload is unused.
> > >
> > > Why did you resend the patch ignoring my review? I already provided you
> > > with a tag, so you should include it.
> > >
> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> > >
> >
> > Sorry about that. I included the tag.
>
> You need to reduce the rate of sending new patches. You sent v1. Then
> you sent again v1, which I reviewed. Then you send v2 without my
> review. So I provided a review. Then you sent again a v2 with my
> reviewed tags. So there are two v1 patches and two v2. Since I
> provided you the review tags for v2, no need to send v2 again. It
> confuses.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Sorry to confuse you.
I made a mistake because I thought that you asked me
 to resend the patches with the new version(v2).
I think you intended that I need to version the patches and
describe changes when I update the patches next time.

Thanks a lot for reviewing my patches.