[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve3UuzRj+0GNRT__XriuYihGx5sLjDYG=JMFooy=4j_dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:10:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "johannes-hahn@...mens.com" <johannes-hahn@...mens.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"werner.zeh@...mens.com" <werner.zeh@...mens.com>,
"henning.schild@...mens.com" <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rtc: rx6110: add ACPI bindings to I2C
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:39 AM johannes-hahn@...mens.com
<johannes-hahn@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Andy,
>
> when comparing the ACPI IDs used in rtc-ds1307.c, which is already on mainline
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c#L1141
>
> for example. Every ID listed there is also not formatted the ACPI ID , PNP ID way defined in the ACPI spec.
>
> How about that ?
Bad examples should not prevent you from doing the right thing, correct?
JFYI: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20201116142859.31257-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists