linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] regulator: add SCMI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201119161308.xhyohop5fspb4b5l@bogus>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:13:08 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     broonie@...nel.org, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lukasz.luba@....com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        satyakim@....qualcomm.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        souvik.chakravarty@....com, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] regulator: add SCMI driver

Hi Mark,

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:34:14PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add a simple regulator based on SCMI Voltage Domain Protocol.
>

I was thinking about how to merge this if and when you have reviewed it
and happy with it. Is it OK to take via ARM SoC with dependent and other
SCMI changes ? Or we can merge the SCMI part next release and the regulator
in the following, up to you.

--
Regards,
Sudeep