linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] regulator: add SCMI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201119162638.GA16158@e120937-lin>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:26:38 +0000
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lukasz.luba@....com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, robh@...nel.org,
        satyakim@....qualcomm.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        souvik.chakravarty@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] regulator: add SCMI driver

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:13:08PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:34:14PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Add a simple regulator based on SCMI Voltage Domain Protocol.
> >
> 
> I was thinking about how to merge this if and when you have reviewed it
> and happy with it. Is it OK to take via ARM SoC with dependent and other
> SCMI changes ? Or we can merge the SCMI part next release and the regulator
> in the following, up to you.
> 

Mark, please note that since v4, to address some modifications on DT I
added for the core too:

[PATCH v5 3/5] regulator: core: add of_match_full_name boolean flag

Thanks

Cristian

> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep