[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f44c5f4f-bda4-a1c1-dc6a-dc31efa314c6@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:36:35 +0100
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: allow compile testing of Exynos, S3C64xx
and S5Pv210
On 11/19/20 17:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> So far all Exynos, S3C64xx and S5Pv210 clock units were selected by
> respective SOC/ARCH Kconfig option. On a kernel built for selected
> SoCs, this allowed to build only limited set of matching clock drivers.
> However compile testing was not possible in such case as Makefile object
> depent on SOC/ARCH option.
"objects depend" or "object depends" ?
> Add separate Kconfig options for each of them to be able to compile
> test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzk@...nel.org>
The patch look good to me, thanks.
Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
I guess it's best now to merge it through your tree as it depends on
patches already sent to arm-soc? Next time it might be better to use
immutable branches right away to keep the clk changes in the clk
maintainer's tree.
--
Regards,
Sylwester
Powered by blists - more mailing lists