lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:36:35 +0100 From: Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: allow compile testing of Exynos, S3C64xx and S5Pv210 On 11/19/20 17:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > So far all Exynos, S3C64xx and S5Pv210 clock units were selected by > respective SOC/ARCH Kconfig option. On a kernel built for selected > SoCs, this allowed to build only limited set of matching clock drivers. > However compile testing was not possible in such case as Makefile object > depent on SOC/ARCH option. "objects depend" or "object depends" ? > Add separate Kconfig options for each of them to be able to compile > test. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzk@...nel.org> The patch look good to me, thanks. Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com> I guess it's best now to merge it through your tree as it depends on patches already sent to arm-soc? Next time it might be better to use immutable branches right away to keep the clk changes in the clk maintainer's tree. -- Regards, Sylwester
Powered by blists - more mailing lists