lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201120163655.GA519670@kozik-lap>
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:36:55 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Jonghwan Choi <charlie.jh@...aocorp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/38] ASoC: tas2562: skip of_device_id table when
 !CONFIG_OF

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:21:56AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Hello
> 
> On 11/20/20 10:16 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The driver can match by multiple methods.  Its of_device_id table is
> > referenced via of_match_ptr() so it will be unused for !CONFIG_OF
> > builds:
> > 
> >    sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c:805:34: warning: ‘tas2562_of_match’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >   sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c b/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c
> > index f1ff204e3ad0..19965fabe949 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c
> > @@ -802,6 +802,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tas2562_id[] = {
> >   };
> >   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tas2562_id);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> 
> Should we use #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ?

I think it does not matter:
1. OF is only bool,
2. This is the existing pattern in many driver (for OF and ACPI),
   see also: Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst
3. ifdef should be faster for preprocessor (less macros to unwind),

It would matter if OF became a module option. In such case anyway a lot
of existing ifdef CONFIG_OF would have to be corrected.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ