lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:52:38 +0000 From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> To: 'Thomas Zimmermann' <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "Huang, Ray" <ray.huang@....com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com> Subject: RE: Linux 5.10-rc4; graphics alignment > Hi David > > Am 18.11.20 um 23:01 schrieb David Laight: ... > Did you try Daniel's suggestion of testing with the direct parent commit? (I was on holiday yesterday and didn't want to spend a sunny afternoon doing bisects.) I've just done that and it is bad. Is there any way to bisect through the parts of the drm merge patch into v5.10-rc1 ? That ought to be quicker (and less error prone) than the bisect builds I was doing. Note that the stack 'splat' is due to a later change. It is separate from the broken pixel alignment. I actually saw the vga text go 'funny' while the boot was outputting all the [OK] messages (from systemd?) before the graphic login stole tty1 (bloody stupid to use tty1). I don't need to use the failing system today, I'll have another go at isolating the failure. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists