[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c474745ae884de3b4ecb8abe2152bfd@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:52:38 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Thomas Zimmermann' <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Huang, Ray" <ray.huang@....com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: RE: Linux 5.10-rc4; graphics alignment
> Hi David
>
> Am 18.11.20 um 23:01 schrieb David Laight:
...
> Did you try Daniel's suggestion of testing with the direct parent commit?
(I was on holiday yesterday and didn't want to spend a sunny
afternoon doing bisects.)
I've just done that and it is bad.
Is there any way to bisect through the parts of the
drm merge patch into v5.10-rc1 ?
That ought to be quicker (and less error prone) than
the bisect builds I was doing.
Note that the stack 'splat' is due to a later change.
It is separate from the broken pixel alignment.
I actually saw the vga text go 'funny' while the boot
was outputting all the [OK] messages (from systemd?)
before the graphic login stole tty1 (bloody stupid
to use tty1).
I don't need to use the failing system today, I'll
have another go at isolating the failure.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists