[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X7e4Zj1yejjLBFyl@workstation.tuxnet>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:36:54 +0100
From: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pwm: pca9685: Add staggered-outputs property
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:21:50AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > The pca9685 driver supports a new staggered-outputs property for reduced
> > current surges and EMI. This adds documentation for the new DT property.
>
> Maybe point out the commit that added this support here?
The pca9685 driver patch was not yet accepted and there will be a v2.
Should I wait until the support is in Linus' tree and only then send a
dt-bindings documentation patch, mentioning the commit?
Best regards,
Clemens
Powered by blists - more mailing lists