linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pwm: pca9685: Add staggered-outputs property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:36:54 +0100
From:   Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pwm: pca9685: Add staggered-outputs property

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:21:50AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > The pca9685 driver supports a new staggered-outputs property for reduced
> > current surges and EMI. This adds documentation for the new DT property.
> 
> Maybe point out the commit that added this support here?

The pca9685 driver patch was not yet accepted and there will be a v2.

Should I wait until the support is in Linus' tree and only then send a
dt-bindings documentation patch, mentioning the commit?

Best regards,
Clemens